Specialist support for the content you produce.

Sector experience is mostly knowing the constraints.

Translation quality is not the differentiator people expect it to be. Any competent agency can produce an accurate sentence. What varies is whether the person managing the project understands the thing the translation has to fit into.

A subtitle has a character limit and a timing. Assessment questions have to stay valid after translation, or the course is broken. Research abstracts have conventions that are not stylistic preferences. Website copy has to survive a content management system and keep its metadata. Getting the sentence right and the container wrong still produces work you cannot use.

How the sectors actually differ.

The six groups below are not marketing segments. They are the six sets of constraints we meet most often, and each one changes how a project is run:

• Agencies and language services need capacity that stays invisible, with client ownership untouched
• Universities and institutions need coordination with an internal language office and predictable turnaround in term time
• Learning and training needs assessment validity preserved, and files that go back into the authoring tool cleanly
• Video and media needs timing, character limits and a review order that does not force re-recording
• International businesses need terminology that holds across documents nobody reads side by side
• Digital and product teams need a publishing handover, not a folder of translated text

Where the depth actually is.

We work into more than twenty-five languages, but the honest claim is narrower than that. The deepest experience is English and Dutch, which is where the company started in the Netherlands in 2008 and where we can speak to nuance rather than accuracy alone. For other pairs we coordinate specialist native linguists, and we are direct about which ones we have long-standing people for.

If your sector is not listed, that is not a refusal. It usually means we want to see a sample before saying yes, because agreeing to work we cannot do well is a worse outcome for both of us than an honest no.