Start with the process you already have
Identify the content type, current tools, review steps and recurring bottlenecks. A workflow project should answer a specific operational question, such as whether AI drafts reduce total effort after specialist correction.
This is a scoped advisory offer. We define the pilot, technical responsibilities and available expertise before committing to an implementation.
Test a representative sample
A fluent output alone is not a business case. The useful comparison includes correction time, review costs, source preparation and the effort required to approve the result.
- A sample that reflects the actual subject and language pair
- Approved tools and restrictions on data use
- A human review rubric covering meaning and terminology
- Time spent reviewing, correcting and resolving queries
- A decision to adopt, modify or stop the proposed workflow
Write down the human handovers
Define who prepares the source, who checks the output and who approves publication. Record what happens when the source is unclear or the generated draft fails the agreed criteria.
Teams can retain a human-only route for content that is unsuitable for the pilot. Existing client preferences and restrictions should continue to govern their projects.
Before you brief us
A few useful answers.
Is this the same as reviewing an AI translation?
No. AI translation review is a delivery service for an existing draft. Workflow consulting examines your process and tests a proposed way of working. Choose the review service if you simply need text checked.
Can you integrate any translation platform?
Integration depends on the tool, access and technical scope. We assess requirements first and only commit to supported work in a written proposal.